You need to have Flash Player 9 installed to see this content

REPUBLIC: Challenge the oath!


No Responses |  0 Plays |  0%  Agree |  0%  Disagree 

Started by  on  April 21 2008

James and Graham from Republic explain new campaign 'Challenge the Oath'. Is being forced to swear an oath of allegiance to the Queen unjust and unfair?



Only registered users may respond to a debate. Click here to Join. Registered users should login above.

Share

Copy and paste these links to share by email, instant message or to embed in your website.

Share as a link

Embed as video

Embed as image

Responses

added April 21 2008

The only alternative to monarchy,is anarchy!

Report as offensive


added April 21 2008

swearing on anything in court is pointless. majoirty of people are repubicans so swearing on queens oath is pointless. Swearing on th bible is pointless too since less than 10% got church.Swearing on yours mother os childs life is pointless as nobody believes in superstitiion. get rid of swearing in court altogether.

Report as offensive


added April 21 2008

We should be a republic and choose/elect our own head of state/president. Monarchy is a feudal hangover of no relevance to a modern state. As a "citizen" I would refuse to swear any oath of allegiance to an arbitrary and unjust and unrepresentative Crown.

Report as offensive


Tags